Penile size in adult men—recommendations for clinical and research measurements (2025)

References

  1. Veale D, Miles S, Read J, Troglia A, Carmona L, Fiorito C, et al. Penile dysmorphic disorder: development of a Screening Scale. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44:2311–21.

    Article Google Scholar

  2. Shah J, Christopher N. Can shoe size predict penile length? BJU Int. 2002;90:586–87.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  3. Choi IH, Kim KH, Jung H, Yoon SJ, Kim SW, Kim TB. Second to fourth digit ratio: a predictor of adult penile length. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:710–14.

    Article Google Scholar

  4. Lever J, Frederick DA, Peplau LA. Does size matter? Men’s and women’s views on penis size across the lifespan. Psychol Men Masc. 2006;7:129–43.

    Article Google Scholar

  5. Dillon BE, Chama NB, Honig SC. Penile size and penile enlargement surgery: a review. Int J Impot Res. 2008;20:519–29.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  6. Veale D, Miles S, Bramley S, Muir G, Hodsoll J. Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15 521 men. BJU Int. 2015;115:978–86.

    Article Google Scholar

  7. Davoudzadeh EP, Davoudzadeh NP, Margolin E, Stahl PJ, Stember DS. Penile length: measurement technique and applications. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6:261–71.

    Article Google Scholar

  8. Wessells H, Lue TF, McAninch JW. Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation. J Urol. 1996;156:995–7.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  9. Kamel I, Gadalla A, Ghanem H, Oraby M. Comparing penile measurements in normal and erectile dysfunction subjects. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2305–10.

    Article Google Scholar

  10. Vasconcelos JS, Figueiredo RT, Nascimento FLB, Damião R, da Silva EA. The natural history of penile length after radical prostatectomy: a long-term prospective study. Urology. 2012;80:1293–7.

    Article Google Scholar

  11. Berookhim BM, Nelson CJ, Kunzel B, Mulhall JP, Narus JB. Prospective analysis of penile length changes after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2014;113:E131–6.

    Article Google Scholar

  12. Khan S, Somani B, Lam W, Donat R. Establishing a reference range for penile length in Caucasian British men: a prospective study of 609 men. BJU Int. 2012;109:740–4.

    Article Google Scholar

  13. Chen XB, Li RX, Yang HN, Dai JC. A comprehensive, prospective study of penile dimensions in Chinese men of multiple ethnicities. Int J Impot Res. 2014;26:172–6.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  14. Schneider T, Sperling H, Lümmen G, Syllwasschy J, Rübben H. Does penile size in younger men cause problems in condom use? a prospective measurement of penile dimensions in 111 young and 32 older men. Urology. 2001;57:314–8.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  15. Chen J, Gefen A, Greenstein A, Matzkin H, Elad D. Predicting penile size during erection. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:328–33.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  16. Herbenick D, Reece M, Schick V, Sanders SA. Erect penile length and circumference dimensions of 1,661 sexually active men in the United States. J Sex Med. 2014;11:93–101.

    Article Google Scholar

  17. Kwon YS, Farber N, Yu JW, Rhee K, Han C, Ney P, et al. Longitudinal recovery patterns of penile length and the underexplored benefit of long-term phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use after radical prostatectomy. BMC Urol. 2018;18:37–44.

    Article Google Scholar

  18. Gaither TW, Awad MA, Osterberg EC, Murphy GP, Allen IE, Chang A, et al. The natural history of erectile dysfunction after prostatic radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2017;14:1071–8.

    Article Google Scholar

  19. Chen KK, Chou YH, Chang LS, Chen MT. Sonographic measurement of penile erectile volume. J Clin Ultrasound. 1992;20:247–53.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  20. Savoie M, Kim SS, Soloway MS. A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;169:1462–4.

    Article Google Scholar

  21. Promodu K, Shanmughadas KV, Bhat S, Nair KR. Penile length and circumference: an Indian study. Int J Impot Res. 2007;19:558–63.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  22. Habous M, Muir G, Tealab A, Williamson B, Elkhouly M, Elhadek W, et al. Analysis of the interobserver variability in penile length assessment. J Sex Med. 2015;12:2031–5.

    Article Google Scholar

  23. Awwad Z, Abu-Hijleh M, Basri S, Shegam N, Murshidi M, Ajlouni K. Penile measurements in normal adult Jordanians and in patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:191–5.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  24. Habous M, Muir G, Soliman T, Farag M, Williamson B, Binsaleh S, et al. Outcomes of variation in technique and variation in accuracy of measurement in penile length measurement. Int J Impot Res. 2018;30:21–6.

    Article Google Scholar

  25. Harding R, Golombok SE. Test-retest reliability of the measurement of penile dimensions in a sample of gay men. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31:351–7.

    Article Google Scholar

  26. Briganti A, Fabbri F, Salonia A, Gallina A, Chun FK-H, Dehò F, et al. Preserved postoperative penile size correlates well with maintained erectile function after bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52:702–7.

    Article Google Scholar

  27. Ponchietti R, Mondaini N, Bonafè M, Di Loro F, Biscioni S, Masieri L. Penile length and circumference: a study on 3,300 young Italian males. Eur Urol. 2001;39:183–6.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  28. Yafi FA, Alzweri L, McCaslin IR, Libby RP, Sangkum P, Sikka SC, et al. Grower or shower? Predictors of change in penile length from the flaccid to erect state. Int J Impot Res. 2018;30:287–91.

    Article Google Scholar

  29. Shirai M, Nakamura M, Ishii N, Mitsukawa S, Sawai Y. Determination of intrapenial blood volume using 99mTc-labeled autologous red blood cells. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1976;120:377–83.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  30. Nelson RP, Lue TF. Determination of erectile penile volume by ultrasonography. J Urol. 1989;141:1123–6.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  31. Margolin EJ, Mlynarczyk CM, Mulhall JP, Stember DS, Stahl PJ. Three-dimensional photography for quantitative assessment of penile volume-loss deformities in Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2017;14:829–33.

    Article Google Scholar

  32. Hricak H, Marotti M, Gilbert TJ, Lue TF, Wetzel LH, McAninch JW, et al. Normal penile anatomy and abnormal penile conditions: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;169:683–90.

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  33. Mulhall JP, Levine LA, Junemann KP. Erection hardness: a unifying factor for defining response in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 2006;68:17–5.

    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Penile size in adult men—recommendations for clinical and research measurements (2025)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Sen. Emmett Berge

Last Updated:

Views: 6062

Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Sen. Emmett Berge

Birthday: 1993-06-17

Address: 787 Elvis Divide, Port Brice, OH 24507-6802

Phone: +9779049645255

Job: Senior Healthcare Specialist

Hobby: Cycling, Model building, Kitesurfing, Origami, Lapidary, Dance, Basketball

Introduction: My name is Sen. Emmett Berge, I am a funny, vast, charming, courageous, enthusiastic, jolly, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.